best practice

Rating: Beneficial

The Sacramento Neighbourhood Alcohol Prevention Project was found effective in a narrative review (EMCDDA, 2012) and in two systematic reviews (Jones et al., 2010; Bolier et al 2011) in:

  • significantly reducing assaults and motor vehicle accidents (based on police and emergency medical service reports);

The 'A Matter of Degree' programme was found effective in a narrative review (EMCDDA, 2012) and in two systematic reviews (Jones et al., 2010; Bolier et al 2011) in:

  • significantly reducing alcohol consumption, alcohol-related harms and drink-driving at follow-up, based on self-reported outcomes (but only at five sites with the highest implementation of environmental programming).

Name of response option

  • Multi-component prevention interventions

Desired outcome(s)

  • reduce drug-related crimes
  • reduce harms
  • reduce risk behaviours
  • reduce substance use

Area(s)

  • Prevention

Specific substance or pattern of use

alcohol

Target group(s) or setting(s)

communities,
partygoers/nightlife
Rating: Evidence of ineffectiveness

Opioid withdrawal with antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia was compared to withdrawal managed with reducing doses of methadone in a systematic review of (Gowing 2010, 8 RCTs, N=1109) and:

  • heavy sedation or anaesthesia increased adverse effects (RR 3.21, 95%CI 1.13 to 9.12);
  • heavy sedation groups showed higher risk of life threatening than the non-heavy sedation groups (RR 14, 95%CI 0.74 to 264).

Name of response option

  • Assisted withdrawal

Desired outcome(s)

  • reduce adverse effects

Area(s)

  • Treatment

Specific substance or pattern of use

opioids
Rating: Unknown effectiveness

Psychosocial interventions were found in a systematic review (Terplan et al., 2015) to have no statistically significant different effect than other standard care interventions in:

  • improving retention in treatment (RR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.93 to 1.06, 9 studies, N=743)
  • improving abstincence (RR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.75 to 1.73, 3 studies, N=367)
  • reducing pre-term birth (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.34 to 1.51, 3 studies, N=264)
  • reducing low birth weight (RR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.36 to 1.43, 1 study, N=160)

Name of response option

  • Psychosocial interventions

Desired outcome(s)

  • improve obstetrical outcomes
  • improve treatment outcomes

Area(s)

  • Treatment

Specific substance or pattern of use

cocaine,
opioids

Target group(s) or setting(s)

women
Rating: Unknown effectiveness

Maintenance treatment with different medications was assessed in a systematic review (Minozzi et al., 2014, 2 studies, N=189 aged 14-21) finding no conclusive results on:

  • completion of treatment;
  • reducing the use of substances; and
  • improving health and social status.

Among the studies, one (N=152) compared Buprenorphine-Naloxone maintenance with buprenorphine detoxification and found:

  • the maintenance treatment group had fewer drop out (RR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.26 to 0.54);
  • but no differences were found for opioid use (RR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.78 to 1.22)

Name of response option

  • Assisted withdrawal

Desired outcome(s)

  • improve treatment outcomes

Area(s)

  • Treatment

Specific substance or pattern of use

opioids

Target group(s) or setting(s)

young people
Rating: Unknown effectiveness

Detoxification treatment alone or in combination with psychosocial intervention compared to no intervention, other pharmacological intervention or psychosocial interventions was assessed in a systematic review (Minozzi et al., 2014, 2 RCTs, N= 190 between 13–18 years of age) finding no conclusive results on:

  • completion of treatment;
  • reducing the use of substances; and
  • improving health and social status.

Among the studies enclosed in the review, one (N=152) compared buprenorphine detoxification with Buprenorphine-Naloxone substitution and found that:

  • the detox group group had more patients dropping out (RR 2.67, 95 % CI 1.85 to 3.86);
  • but no differences were found for opioid use (RR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.82 to 1.28).

Name of response option

  • Assisted withdrawal

Desired outcome(s)

  • improve treatment outcomes

Area(s)

  • Treatment

Specific substance or pattern of use

opioids

Target group(s) or setting(s)

young people
Top