best practice

Rating: Unknown effectiveness

A systematic review with no meta-analysis (Esrick et al 2018, 17 studies) found that scare tactics and fear-based messages may be effective in preventing substance misuse. The studies focused on campaigns addressing the use of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, or methamphetamine.

Name of response option

  • scare tactics and fear-based messages

Desired outcome(s)

  • reduce substance use

Area(s)

  • Prevention
Rating: Likely to be beneficial

Parental training, not associated with children training resulted in a narrative report of 9 studies (Bühler and Kröger, 2006):

  • improved children’s educational behaviour;
  • reduced children’s problem behaviour

Name of response option

  • Family-based prevention programmes

Desired outcome(s)

  • reduce risk behaviours

Area(s)

  • Prevention

Specific substance or pattern of use

not-drug specific

Target group(s) or setting(s)

families
Rating: Beneficial

MDFT was compared to IP in one study (INCANT study- N= 450, Rigter et al., 2012, cited in EMCDDA 2014) and was found to be more effective in:

  • reducing the frequency of cannabis consumption in the high-severity MDFT group more than the corresponding IP group across assessments points (differential slope coefficient on treatment=3.8 [95% CI=1.4 to 7.6], p=0.002)
  • reducing the prevalence of cannabis use disorders at 12-month follow-up. Namely, 38% of MDFT adolescents met the criteria for cannabis dependence and 33% for cannabis abuse, with 18% no longer having a cannabis disorder. In IP, the corresponding numbers were 52%, 22%, and 15% (differential slope coefficient on treatment=0.9 [95 % CI=0.2 to 1.7], p=0.015). 
  • decreasing the number of dependence symptoms from baseline to 12-month follow-up. The 12-month symptoms average was 2.4 for MDFT (SD=2.0) and 3.0 for IP (SD=2.0). The drop in symptoms was larger in MDFT than in IP (differential slope coefficient on treatment=0.27 [95 % CI=0.13 to 0.41], p<0.001).
  • retaining patients in treatment. A higher proportion (90%) of MDFT patients completed therapy in comparison to IP (48%) (OR=9.8 [95 % CI=5.7 to 16.7], p<0.001).

Name of response option

  • Multidimensional family therapy

Desired outcome(s)

  • reduce substance use
  • retain patients in treatment

Area(s)

  • Treatment

Specific substance or pattern of use

cannabis

Target group(s) or setting(s)

families,
young people
Rating: Likely to be beneficial

Combining CBT with antidepressants was found in a comprehensive review (EMCDDA 2015) to be effective in:

  •    improving outcomes for comorbid opioid and anxiety disorders patients

Name of response option

  • Integrated co-morbidity treatment

Desired outcome(s)

  • improve mental health outcomes
  • reduce substance use

Area(s)

  • Treatment

Specific substance or pattern of use

co-morbidity,
opioids

Target group(s) or setting(s)

dual-diagnosis patients
Top