BE smokeFREE - enhance students’ self-efficacy to help them cope with social pressure in school

At a glance

Country of origin

  • Norway
  • Last reviewed:
    03.12.2019
    Age group
    11-14 years
    15-18/19 years
    Target group
    Pupils between grades 7 and 9 (12-15 years), as well as teachers and parents
    Programme setting(s)
    School

    The BE smokeFREE intervention is a classroom-based intervention that aims to enhance students’ self-efficacy to help them cope with pressure. The intervention also aims to increase positive expectancies of a smoke-free lifestyle. The intervention is delivered by teachers and other school staff over three academic years from grade 7 to 9 (12-15 years of age). There are eight hours’ of content in the first year, five in the second and six in the third.

    Keywords

    No data

    Links to this programme in other registries

    Implementation Experiences

    Read the experiences of people who have implemented this programme.

    Contact details

    Dr Ola Josendal, PhD
    Research Centre for Health Promotion, Norway
    Email: Ola.josendal[a]psych.uib.no

    Overview of results from the European studies

    Evidence rating

  • Beneficial
  • About Xchange ratings

    Studies overview

    The programme has been evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) in Norway involving children aged approximately 13 years. At post-test, there was a statistically significant positive effect on self-reported smoking, with the intervention participants having a lower probability of becoming a smoker, smoking daily or smoking weekly. Programme participants also had a significantly lower probability of using cannabis compared to the control condition.

    Click here to see the reference list of studies

    Countries where evaluated

    • Norway

    Characteristics

    Protective factor(s) addressed

    • Family: parent involvement in learning/education
    • Individual and peers: refusal skills and decision making

    Risk factor(s) addressed

    • Individual and peers: early initiation of drug/alcohol use

    Outcomes targeted

    • Other health outcomes
    • Smoking (tobacco)

    Description of programme

    The BE smokeFREE intervention was developed by the Norwegian Cancer Society and was designed as a smoking prevention programme for students in grades 7-9 (12-15 years of age). The BE smokeFREE intervention is a classroom-based, teacher-delivered intervention based on the social influence model and focused on opportunities for individuals to choose. In line with Bandura’s social cognitive theory, the intervention aims to enhance students’ self-efficacy to help them cope with pressure. The intervention also aims to increase positive expectancies of a smoke-free lifestyle. This is achieved by providing details on the smoking and the positive short- and long-term effects of not smoking on health.

    The intervention is delivered by teachers in a classroom setting; it consists of eight hours in the first year, five in the second and six in the third. Each school hour allocated to the programme involves elements of non-traditional classroom activities using videos, games and group work. There is no information about what the content of the intervention actually entails, but some of the features that had been used in previous successful anti-smoking programmes are incorporated.

    Implementation Experiences

    Feedback date

    Monday, September 16, 2019

    Contact details

    Main obstacles

    With respect to individual professionals

    The critical point of entrance was the school principal/top administration. Two thirds of all Norwegian secondary schools implemented the programme. A third did not implement it, because of the above mentioned.

    Once the schools decided to join the programme, we encountered very few obstacles; it was implemented by highly motivated teachers.

    With respect to social context

    At the beginning of the implementation, one could observe anti-programme subcultures among the smokers. However, as the years went by, the number of smokers decreased, and, in parallel to this, there was a reduction in the anti-programme obstacles.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    The main obstacle was, as mentioned before, the key to the implementation: the principal/top administration at the schools. In as many as one third of the schools, the programme was not implemented.

    How they overcame the obstacles

    With respect to individual professionals

    The programme was heavily supported by governmental institutions as well as physicians and other well-qualified personnel.

    With respect to social context

    The issue was mainly not paying much attention to such obstacles. A well-planned programme with a recognised and well-documented effect should be performed without wasting energy on resistance based on a lack of knowledge.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    Endure the obstacles and perform at the schools that are involved in the programme.

    Lessons learnt

    With respect to individual professionals

    Ensure support from governmental institutions as well as academic and professional societies.

    With respect to social context

    It was a major success, based on the will and skill to endure obstacles that arose.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    Endure and perform. The results were very encouraging.

    Strengths

    Well-planned; well-documented results; support from governmental institutions as well as professional and academic institutions

    Weaknesses

    Maybe it should have been mandatory for all secondary schools to join the programme.

    Opportunities

    NA

    Threats

    NA

    Recommendations

    With respect to individual professionals

    Provide well-prepared documentation of all aspects of the programme. Point out the excellent results.

    With respect to social context

    Ensure support from both health and educational governmental institutions.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    Ensure that the programme supports schools with free materials and so forth.

    Note from the authors

    Implemented nationwide in 2001.

    Number of implementations

    1
    Top