European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA / PASE.bcn) - addressing young people, parents, school environment and out-of-school situations

At a glance

Country of origin

  • Netherlands
  • Last reviewed:
    18.10.2017
    Age group
    11-14 years
    15-18/19 years
    Target group
    All adolescents
    Programme setting(s)
    Community
    Family
    School

    The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) addresses four target groups/situations: young people, parents, schools and the out-of-school situation. Programme components consist of (i) smoking prevention through health education within the curriculum (a range of smoking prevention lessons that use the essential elements of a social skills approach); (ii) stimulating a smoke-free school environment (e.g. smoking regulation policies, smoking cessation training for teachers and parents); and (iii) out of-school regional smoking prevention activities (e.g. ongoing regional publicity and out-of-school smoke-free activities for adolescents). The programme is teacher-led and lasts about two school terms.

    The programme has been implemented in six countries. To meet local and cultural needs, each country developed and used its own materials, taking into account the core goals and objectives.

    Keywords

    No data

    Contact details

    Professor Hein de Vries PhD
    Department of Health Education and Promotion
    Maastricht University
    PO Box 616, 6200 MD
    Maastricht, the Netherlands
    Phone: + 31-43-388 2410
    E-mail: devries[a]gvo.unimaas

    Overview of results from the European studies

    Evidence rating

  • Possibly beneficial
  • About Xchange ratings

    Studies overview

    The programme has been evaluated in one quasi-experimental study across Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, UK, Portugal and Spain. The average age of young people was 13.3 years. Self-reported measures were completed, and all results reported here were post-test.

    In Spain, fewer young people in the intervention condition began to smoke (statistically significant) and more participants in the control group began to smoke weekly (only marginally statistically significant p=0.08). There was no effect on intention to take up smoking in the next year.

    In Finland, fewer intervention group participants began smoking but this was not a statistically significant effect. Fewer intervention group participants began to smoke weekly (statistically significant at 24 months after baseline, and marginally significant (p=0.06) at 30 months i.e. post-test). There was no effect on intention to take up smoking in the next year.

    In Portugal, there were fewer participants from the intervention group who began to smoke, and who began to smoke weekly, compared to the control group. Fewer intervention participants reported intentions to smoke in the next year. (All of these differences were statistically significant.)

    In the UK, there was no effect on smoking. However, there was a statistically significant favouring the intervention on intention to take up smoking in the next year.

    Counter-productive effects were found in the Netherlands and Denmark, where more participants in the intervention group became smokers and more participants began to smoke weekly compared to the control group. Although the negative effect on weekly smoking was statistically significant in Denmark in the initial years of the programme, the only (negative) effect that was statistically significant at the end of programme was weekly smokers in the Netherlands. The effect on intention to take up smoking in the next year was not statistically significant in either country.

    Overall analysis showed that there was a statistically significant effect on weekly smoking, but not on the number of smokers. The study also measured attitudes and self-efficacy using five measures, the effects on which were largely not statistically significant at the end of the programme (30 months from baseline) across the different countries. Overall, fewer intervention participants believed in the advantages of smoking and more intervention participants had social self-efficacy (refraining from smoking in social situations).

    Click here to see the reference list of studies

    Countries where evaluated

    • Denmark,
    • Finland,
    • Netherlands,
    • Portugal,
    • Spain,
    • United Kingdom

    Characteristics

    Protective factor(s) addressed

    • Individual and peers: refusal skills and decision making

    Risk factor(s) addressed

    • Family: parental attitudes favourable to alcohol/drug use
    • Individual and peers: favourable attitude towards alcohol/drug use

    Outcomes targeted

    • Smoking (tobacco)

    Description of programme

    The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) addresses four target groups/situations: young people, parents, schools and the out-of-school situation. Programme components consist of (i) smoking prevention through health education within the curriculum (a range of smoking prevention lessons that use the essential elements of a social skills approach); (ii) stimulating a smoke-free school environment (e.g. smoking regulation policies, smoking cessation training for teachers and parents); and (iii) out-of-school regional smoking prevention activities (e.g. ongoing regional publicity and out-of-school smoke-free activities for adolescents). The programme is teacher-led and lasts about two school terms.

    The programme has been implemented in six countries. In each of the participating countries, a special national project manager was appointed, who was responsible for the development and implementation of the project. The project manager worked in conjunction with a national steering group made up of representatives of relevant national organisations in the field of smoking prevention. The content of the ESFA programme was finalised when consensus was reached on goals and core objectives during meetings between the contractors and national project managers. Despite reaching consensus on the core objectives, all countries wanted the freedom to aim for other objectives, so each country used and/or developed its own materials, taking into account the core goals and objectives. The programmes were all implemented in the autumn and winter of 1998, and were all teacher-led.

    Finland: this programme has been implemented in 13 experimental schools. The programme includes five one-hour lessons that provide information on smoking prevention in general; how to say no; the consequences of smoking and reasons for smoking; the development of refusal skills; and opinions on and reasons for not smoking. A video demonstrates social influences and a drama group demonstrates social influence resistance skills. The participants do not receive a student manual. The lessons are teacher-led; the teachers receive 20 hours of training, manuals and credits for following training. At school level, the ESFA School Policy Guide is used. Parents receive a ‘Quit & Win’ brochure on smoking cessation and are invited to participate in the ‘Quit & Win’ competition. For the out-of-school component, three posters are developed to be displayed in places in schools where children spend much of their free time. Finally, the participants are sent two tabloid-style newsletters, which include peer models explaining their decision to be non-smokers and offering advice on how to avoid smoking.

    Denmark: this programme has been implemented in 30 schools. The programme includes six one-hour lessons that discuss smoking prevention in general; personal responsibility and alternatives to smoking; social pressure; refusal skills; making one’s own choices; skills training; the impact of advertising; and smoking policies. Pupils receive a student manual. Teachers receive a tutorial, background information, transparencies, and worksheets for the children. At school level, the ESFA School Policy Guide is disseminated. Parents receive a letter about the ESFA project, how to discuss tobacco use with their child and how to order smoking cessation materials. For the out-of-school component, two posters are developed for schools, classroom walls, canteens and public places such as libraries, swimming halls and sports centres. The participants are sent three postcards featuring the same images as the posters. Finally, a brochure is disseminated to community youth leaders describing how to discuss non-smoking with adolescents.

    The Netherlands: this programme includes five one-hour lessons. The first three lessons consist of the national programme, providing information on general smoking prevention, personal decision making, and intentions. The lessons use teacher and student manuals. Two video lessons using soap operas demonstrate social influences and social influence resistance skills using verbal and non-verbal communication. At school level, the ESFA School Smoke-Free Policy Guide is used. Regional health coordinators receive a package describing how to inform parents and school personnel about smoking prevention and the ESFA project, along with examples of presentations and letters introducing the ESFA project, promotional materials (posters, postcards and stickers) and cessation materials. Posters and flyers are disseminated out of school in cases where schools are interested in this.

    The United Kingdom: this programme includes five lessons, lasting 30 minutes each. The lessons address smoking prevention in general; economic and environmental consequences of smoking; reasons for smoking; advertising; and decision making. The schoolchildren use worksheets and computer games. Teachers attend a one-day training course and receive manuals. Quit, a national non-smoking organisation, implements drama sessions where children interact with actors, discussing their opinions about smoking and how to stick to their opinions. The Seven Steps to Success policy manual produced by the Health Education Authority is disseminated in schools. There are no parental or community activities.

    Portugal: this programme includes six lessons, partly based on the adapted PASE project implemented in Barcelona, that address the effects of tobacco; reasons for not smoking; and social influences, skills and decision making. The schoolchildren use worksheets. Teachers attend a 48-hour training course and receive a manual, and they are given credits for following the training course and giving lessons. Schools receive the ESFA non-smoking policy manual and a non-smoking poster for the national no-smoking day. On that day, teachers receive a letter asking them to discuss issues relating to smoking again with their pupils, and many schools also organise other activities (mainly involving sports). At the community level, the Portuguese health minister and the mayor of the local community publicise the ESFA project on the national no-smoking day.

    Spain: in this programme, at the individual level, the PASE project has been adapted to the standards of ESFA, and includes sessions on increasing self-efficacy and training in refusal skills. The materials include teacher manuals, two videos, and worksheets for the children. Pupils receive six lessons on the effects of tobacco; peer pressure; advertising; the prevalence of smoking behaviour; the difficulty of quitting; refusal skills training; and planning future behaviour. Teachers receive four training sessions of two hours. Schools receive the ESFA schools policy manual, along with a letter for parents and non-smoking stickers. One poster is disseminated out of school.

    Implementation Experiences

    Feedback date

    Tuesday, October 03, 2017

    Contact details

    Carles Ariza, MD,PhD,MPH
    Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona (Public Health Agency, Barcelona)
    cariza[a]aspb.cat

    Main obstacles

    With respect to individual professionals

    The programme is implemented by teachers, with the support of health professionals from the Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona (the Public Health Agency of Barcelona (ASPB)) for resources and training.
    The main obstacle is the lack of training in and awareness of teaching professionals with regard to the importance of smoking and alcohol consumption prevention among young people.

    With respect to social context

    The main obstacle until now has been that the implementation of health promotion programmes in school is not mandatory for schools.
    Second, being the oldest programme offered by the ASPB, we have observed a certain difficulty in maintaining the interest of schools that have previously been regular participants.
    Third, as it is a programme that, above all, addresses smoking prevention, and smoking has decreased over recent years among young Spaniards, schools believe that the programme is no longer necessary.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    The main obstacle is that the programme has to compete with other preventive programmes, and also other proposals from other companies and bodies, which in most cases have not been evaluated.
    In addition, many of these offers are made with the proposal that the intervention be carried out by a health professional, supplanting the teacher.

    How they overcame the obstacles

    With respect to individual professionals

    Despite the obstacles, the programme covers about 35-40 % of schools in the city.
    Each year, the ASPB calls on schools to participate in the programme and a training and counselling workshop is held for new implementer professionals at its premises.

    With respect to social context

    We have attempted to renew and update the programme, with major and minor changes, but not as often as we would have liked. The most recent version, the fourth, was first used during the 2016-17 school year.
    We have also lobbied at the political level, so far without success, for health education to be made a mandatory part of the school curriculum.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    The agency has improved the presentation and characteristics of its resources to make them more competitive and has intensified the message to school managers about the importance of preventive interventions being effective. It has also highlighted the lack of sustainability when these interventions are carried out by non-school professionals.

    Lessons learnt

    With respect to individual professionals

    Most importantly, the good response of teaching professionals and schoolchildren to work on social skills and decision-making to enable children to make informed decisions when offered drugs such as tobacco or alcohol.

    With respect to social context

    A number of schools, which could nonetheless be larger, have decided that the prevention of smoking and other drug addictions should be retained as part of the school curriculum.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    In an earlier version of the programme, the cost per student was EUR 12.45. A study showed that the cost-benefit ratio is 22:74 and that, if the programme had a 1 % effectiveness rating (a very conservative assumption), it would prevent 67 children becoming smokers. In the evaluation of the second version (Ariza et al, 2008), the programme PASE.bcn was found to have an effectiveness of 4.6 %. The cost saved was EUR 1 022.78 for each person prevented from smoking (Hormigo, 2009).

    Strengths

    • Easy application of the programme.
    • Good coverage, given the context.
    • Good programme effectiveness.
    • Sustainability of the programme over time.

    Weaknesses

    • The programme can be tiring for the professionals involved in delivering it.
    • Need for periodic renewal.
    • Competitiveness of the other interventions available.
    • Changes in young smokers’ behaviour.

    Opportunities

    • To maintain smoking prevention in an important part of the target population.
    • To keep the teachers involved motivated on the subject.
    • To follow the evolution of the problem and adapt the preventive messages of the programme.
    • To continuously improve the intervention.

    Threats

    • Teachers less worried by adolescent smoking behaviour.
    • Lack of regulation and a curricular framework for health education.
    • Difficulty of keeping programme resources up to date.
    • Shortage of curricular time and competition with other training activities.

    Recommendations

    With respect to individual professionals

    Ensure that teachers are sufficiently trained in and committed to the prevention of smoking and use of other addictive substances.
    Provide feedback to teachers with data on changes in smoking behaviour and offer them updated preventive resources.

    With respect to social context

    Emphasise to teachers that the prevention of drug addiction involves teaching a personal skill: learning how to say no when you do not want to participate.
    Support public policies on smoke-free places, and also those aimed at limiting the consumption of other addictive substances.

    With respect to organisational and economic context

    Increase the price of tobacco and alcohol.
    Advertising campaigns supporting non-smokers and promoting the enjoyment of free time without drugs can be effective.
    It is helpful to provide regular high-quality information to families and school staff on the progress of the implementation of the programme.

    Note from the authors

    Implemented in the region of Catalunya.
    It is also offered, in a complementary way in Spanish, in Navarra.

    Number of implementations

    1
    Top